There are no penguins in the arctic, at least not anymore. In the 1960s Robert Silverberg wrote a hat trick of books about natural history and science. Funny thing, when I ordered them from Amazon they came discarded from Jr. High libraries. After reading two of them I realized that Jr. High students must have been capable of much higher degrees of thinking than the standard secondary children are forced to endure today. They are written in a plain spoken and easy to understand manner, that in no way detracts from their scholarly contribution to knowledge. But enough about the state of education in the 21st century, back to the northern penguins.
The penguins of the north are more commonly known as the Great Auk. This flightless bird was nearly 3 feet tall and weighted in a bit over ten pounds. Early European explorers found them a very convenient food source. See where this is going?
Nomenclature has always been terribly interesting to me, and these are no exceptions. According to one story recounted by Silverberg says the fishermen of Brittany gave the bird a Celtic name, pen-gwyn, which translates to “white-head.” Others argue that it comes from the Latin pinguis which means fat. A third school of thought has something to do with pinioning which basically means making a bird unable to fly. Either way they name took hold and was reason enough, according to Silverberg, for Sir Frances Drake and other voyagers in the late sixteenth century, to call the different black and white flightless seabirds “southern penguins”
They eventually became rare on the rocky Islands of the Northern Atlantic where they would breed. Silverberg says that between 1833 and 1844 they were systematically removed from the Island of Eldey off Iceland. One by one brought back and sold to some eager Museum representative.
One paragraph from the book I will repeat here in full. (I take some interest in whether this is the first time Silverberg’s work has been uploaded in a blog but that is neither here nor there:
On June 4, 1844, three fishermen named Jon Brandesson, Sigurdr Islefesson, and Ketil Ketilsson made a trip to Eldey. They had been hired by an Icelandicbird collector named Carl Siemsen, who wanted auk specimens. Jon Brandssonfound an auk and killed it. Sigurdr Islefesson found another and did the same. KetilKetilsson had to return empty-handed, because his two companions had just
completed the extinction of the Great Auk.
(p. 94, The Auk, the Dodo, and the Oryx. Robert Silverberg, 1967)
As short as that was I feel that I should offer you a twofer here. For some readers this means you can stop here and come back later, for the rest of the story. (only without Paul Harvey)
Per request I dug back through some posted articles to find something interesting on crows, magpies, ravens, etc. Not hard, these guys are more than meets the eye. That does not mean they turn into monster trucks or tanks and attack one another. But, that they are pretty good problem solvers.
I am going to this the lazy way and post the links for the studies. I have other things, which are more pressing for my education, even if they are extremely less interesting than this blog. Hopefully that changes soon, but whatever.
Back in May of 2009 Rebecca Marelle reported for the BBC about Rooks making tools. There are a couple of videos in the article
. Basically it shows rooks using tools, not unlike the chimps using grass to catch termites, and you know how we all swoon over chimp termite catching.
Rooks are part of the corvids, the same group as new caledonian crows. Both of which are known for their tool use prowess. This Sciencedaily article
reveals just how well the crows can use tools, and how many they can use at a time. Apparently they can use up to three tools in proper sequence without being trained. This is similar to another article I read in BBC knowledge where they could choose. There was one straw, too short to reach the food in a wooden cage, and another straw long enough, but behind another cage like barricade. The birds used the short straw to get the long one, and then use the long one to get the food.
Another article about rooks show them actually making tools. Again back in 2009 this study
shows rooks making a hook to get food from a graduated cylinder looking device.
Maybe Aesop was right, maybe they even use rocks to raise the water level to drink. Food for thought. I leave you with another tidbit I read in BBC knowledge but cannot find a link to. Magpies have a self awareness at least on par with some mammals. Most bird will attack a reflection of themselves. Exceptions in this case would be parakeets who love the company of their reflection and play with it affectionately. Magpies in the study were given the “dot test.” I am unsure the technical name for this test but they place a small colored (usually red) disc sticker on the bird and then present the subject with it’s reflection. The magpies to a man (bird) all attempted to remove the colored discs from themselves. They recognize that they were the bird in the looking glass. Cognitive abilities. Amazing to watch, too.
I will leave this mostly scientific and scholarly post with two of the best examples of how intelligent magpies can be:
Finally one on the teamwork prowess and brotherhood that unites crows everywhere: